 |
|
 |
|
| Posts by XkeeperPLUS |
|
|
|
Pages:  1  |
|
|
|
|
|
I'm playing everybody's hack and streaming it live to THE INTERNET!
I'm also rating your hacks based on FUN LEVEL. Unfortunately most of you really suck at that part.
Please to be making better hacks because my savestate load key is wearing out really fast.
TIPS TO MAKE YOUR HACK NOT ASS SHIT.
|
| Last edited on 2012-03-05 03:28:11 AM by XkeeperPLUS. |
|
|
|
Originally posted by MrDeePayOriginally posted by XkeeperPLUSI'm also rating your hacks based on FUN LEVEL. Unfortunately most of you really suck at that part.
"Fun" is subjective.
So is art. But I don't think poop smeared on a wall would be defined as art by anybody rational.
QuoteQuotePlease to be making better hacks because my savestate load key is wearing out really fast.
Most of the entries don't even require tool assistance, that's just your own sub-par playing speaking there. By the way, being vulgar like that only makes you look foolish, childish, and too much like a tryhard, regardless of the point you're trying to make.
Let me give you a real example of how one hack went.
Start:
1. Oh, I can go left here. ...which leads to an inescapable pit with water, so I immediately lose life #1. There's no obvious way out outside from dying.
2. Well, let's go right. That's cool, there's munchers placed seemingly random along the ground, and one block off the ground. The guy is trying to be cute, I guess. So add another death because I had the audacity to check if these ones one tile off the ground hurt (because there were munchers in the intro that were purely decorative). Death #2.
3. OK, a bit further to the right this time. Huge pit with flopping fish and random glass tiles for corners (????). Some random searching finds a note block out, and a door on top of an upside down blue-! block. Try to jump on the door... death. What a shocker, I guess. Why does an upside-down ! block hurt me? Who knows.
4. I find a pipe that leads nowhere of value, and another pipe a bit further along that path that returns me to the start. Fun! Nothing like going around in a circle.
5. I go further to the right in the main stage to see what's over there. A big, plain slope.... which ends in more munchers. Why? Who knows. My patience with this hack and its obtuse design leads me to just slide into the pit, basically throw away my final life and then proceed to toss it into the shit pile.
You know who you are.
I also had a lot of "fun" experiences involving bugs, where someone had the bright idea to put an invisible wall along the top of his level to stop people from jumping out of it, but forgot one area. So of course I jump off the top of the screen and get stuck in some scenery with no way out.
Another fun example: blocks in some dungeon stage laid out like "[spike][block][spike]". Here's a fun fact for you, designer: those spikes reduce the safe zone for a single block by about half. If you go anywhere near the edge of it, even if you would ordinarily still be on top of the block, you take damage and die. Awesome.
This is not fun. This is bad design, and almost all of you are horribly guilty of it.
(I also keep a count in my head of the number of random munchers and spikes thrown about a level. I take away exponential numbers of points based on how many I see. One or two is passable. Five is starting to get grating, and if you honestly need to use any more munchers to make a level you're doing it very, very wrong.)
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by MrDeePay
That level is doable without tool assistance, but it had garbage design.
Quoteexperience #2 + words
Also a case of bad design, but not necessarily of one that requires tool assistance. You just come off as having a very, very low threshold.
Well, it's certainly nice that, presented with arguments that directly invalidate the stupid thing you just finished saying, you go "Bu-bu-but-but those don't count!"
Bravo to you sir.
oh cool you can't embed a youtube video here apparently.
|
| Last edited on 2012-03-05 11:43:31 AM by XkeeperPLUS. |
|
|
|
Originally posted by ShogOn a related note, who cares about Xkeeper rating, especially if
a) we never heard anything from him before and
b) something unorthodox as "fun" despite the fact that i don't think - for example - that Ripperon-X's level was, despite beginning, not fun at all. Should I tell him "Yo bro you suck"? That doesn't make sense. It was actually a little flaw if think about it, fixing it could be possible by simply removing stuff. That's all.
I've been around a lot longer than you have. I just don't participate on SMWC because quite frankly I hate SMWC with a passion for a variety of reasons, the least of which is how everybody thinks "Ooh! You know what my hack needs? MORE MUNCHERS."
Also most levels can indeed be fun by removing things! I find I enjoy SMW hacks a lot more if I, say, forget to patch the ROM.
(Also, maybe because I'm not usually part of your community, so for the most part you're getting the raw opinion of someone who isn't part of SMWCirclejerk.)
Quote(I'm wonderin though why a lot people says that most levels are to hard, because it sounds like everyone is playing the same entry. I mean it can't be possible that every level is identical "to hard"...right?
Maybe because they are. If you're on SMWC, chances are you play a lot of hacks, which means you might actually get good at the game, especially if you decide to play stupid overly-hard hacks that require precise jumps. I don't. In fact, I don't play SMW hacks at all aside from when the contest rolls around, because it's supposed to strictly be a level-design contest and not who can put the most unfitting music and graphics ripped from their favorite shitty game into SMW.
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by yoguiXkeeperPLUS: Fun is subjective. Because I had lot of fun playing some of the entries unlike you. I can agree that some levels weren't perfect, but saying there were not fun at all is a bit much. For example you put Maximum Athleticus in your no fun folder and I don't understand why, because it was a nice simple level with classical obstacles. There was nothing wrong with it and I enjoyed it. See, it's not that the level was not fun, it's just that you didn't have fun.
I'm sure I could dig out the video for why it's there, but not right now. Maybe later.
Originally posted by Ripperon-XIf you don't like this community, why don't you make us a good favor and leave this?
boo hoo
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by MaxodeXThen:
1. Do better.
To use the poop-smearing analogy again, I generally don't think someone has to be a master of the art of poop-smearing to tell you that your poop-smearing all over the wall is horrible and awful.
This argument is really old and debunked a billion times. Or do you watch a bad movie and go "WOW, THAT MOVIE SURE WAS GREAT, BECAUSE I CAN'T SAY IT WAS BAD BECAUSE I AM NOT A DIRECTOR WHO MADE BILLIONS OF DOLLARS. BOO HOO."?
idiot.
Quote2. Don't play the hacks at all.
boo hoo. someone on the internet thinks my hack sucks.
Corollary: Don't read my posts if you can't handle it. In fact, just get off the internet, and perhaps refer to your right hand for someone who will always be there to keep your spirits up.
QuoteShut up and leave if you don't have anything helpful to say to anyone of us. Saying "you guys suck because i cant play these hacks" is not going to make us make "funner" hacks.
Here's a small hack. It's small. The level design went through about 10 different iterations while I found a way to make it so that the first few times you played it you might not get a fast time, but after time you would notice the way enemies are laid out in a way to facilitate pretty interesting aerobatics to move faster.
The stage is difficult to get a good time on, but not difficult to win.
(The only part about this stage I don't like is the double-backing path, actually.)
QuoteI'm still laughing at the fact you joined just to complain about this.
Laughing, or choking back bitter internet tears?
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by Ripperon-XNow, seriously, you should just leave. And no things like "boo hoo" to me, please.
I'm going to stay here if only because the fact you can't seem to say anything else other than "please leave" is funny.
Omelet du fromage.
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by MaxodeXIf I watch a bad movie I can say it's bad because, unlike a hack, I can't do that by myself just like that. You can with smw because you just need a ROM, Lunar Magic and a brain, you don't need a full movie-equipment with a giantic team.
So what about critics and movie reviews, then? Should we disregard those too, because clearly anything other than complete gushing praise is HORRIBLE, AWFUL, TERRIBLE unless you feel like wasting hours of your life one-upping someone?
You're not going to win this argument. Stop trying. Lay down in front of the rocket.
QuoteWeird thing is that I can handle it. Also I wouldn't care less about a guy not liking my hack. I do this for actual feedback and fun.
But only positive feedback! Anybody not circlejerking you for a job well done is a horrible, evil, terrible person, who clearly should make their own hacks before daring to say anything!
QuoteNot like you're the only one who can make something like that. You just have to be perseptive.
QuoteAlso:
QuoteI'm going to stay here if only because the fact you can't seem to say anything else other than "please leave" is funny.
" boo hoo"
The difference (I know it's hard for your peanut of a brain to understand) is that all of my posts that have used that (about three) also contained a mountain of actual words and content. Strawman arguments are the best.
Originally posted by MrDerpParpI am mainly responding to what is seemingly a low tolerance to difficulty you're having.
Because making one-tile jumps over grinders with boo blocks is not fun or difficult. It is stupid.
Quote(I would not be surprised if you were a rereg or a more extreme Raofan.)
"I cannot be assed to do three seconds of research on who this person is, so I will blatantly accuse them of being a rereg of a person they don't even know."
QuoteIf these levels are getting you to tool abuse for one reason or another, then you need to step your game up.
Or maybe the people designing the levels should stop taking inspiration from Asshole Mario. That would be nice.
|
| Last edited on 2012-03-05 01:56:33 PM by XkeeperPLUS. |
|
|
|
Originally posted by WeeabuuIf you're referring to Kaizo Mario, its actual translation would be "Remodeled Mario". Not that it has any relevance to the current discussion but I felt like pointing it out.
|
|
|
|
I called it Asshole Mario specifically because Kaizo doesn't actually mean what most people here think it means. (In fact, if you watch the video of me playing these hacks, you will see this exact point mentioned.)
sigh
QuoteLol, hi Xkeeper.
I like where this thread is going.
That was the account I used for css3 abuse, yes. You found it! Way to go, have a cookie.
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by MaxodeXThing is I take that negative feedback as something I would fix, but yours is not feedback, so yeah.
feedˇback /ˈfēdˌbak/
Noun: Information about reactions to a product, [...]
Quoteoh ok. And content for you would be...?
Look, I can take part of your post and crop part of it out too:
I have just conclusively proved that your posts are nothing but typos and grammatical issues. Zing!
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by AUSYou said you were streaming but I have no way of getting to your stream. What's the deal?
stream. but not now, because I am at work, making money.
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by MrDeePayYou're either not getting the point I'm making about your poor tolerance to difficult things
Some people have higher tolerance to pain, but generally that doesn't mean that they find being punched to be at all enjoyable.
Not everybody lives off a diet of Muncher-flavored noodles.
Also: Whose idiotic idea was it to make tab actually insert a tab instead of moving to the next control? I want to punch that person in the face.
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by andy_k_250Originally posted by XkeeperPLUS13 posts worth of verbal diarrhea
Congratulations -- you're in your 20's and you know how to rile up teenagers on a Mario forum.
ICE BURN
|
|
|
| Pages: 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
The purpose of this site is not to distribute copyrighted material, but to honor one of our favourite games.
Copyright © 2005 - 2013 - SMW Central
Legal Information - Link To UsTotal queries: 27
|
|
|
|
