Language…
15 users online:  AmperSam, CharlieUltra, Courage2006, CroNo, DanMario24YT, GamesInTweed, GRIMMKIN, HobbesSMW, Metal-Yoshi94, MorrieTheMagpie, Nayfal, rafaelfutbal, TheOrangeToad, Tulip Time Scholarship Games, underway - Guests: 301 - Bots: 383
Users: 64,795 (2,370 active)
Latest user: mathew

What is your worst website design you ever saw?

Including design, schemes, content, service etc.

Here is mine:
http://www.hackershomepage.com/ (warning! reports says that it may be infected)

Problems:
  1. Watermarks. Okay, I understand theft is a problem, but would you like to see "©hackershomepage.com" on all of the images and videos to have the potential to even block the view? Some of them are transperent. The most grudge I have is that they don't even have them formatted correctly and it looks exactly like this:

    Originally posted by unprofessional watermark
    ©
    hackershomepage.com


    It has no proper font size (like they could've use a bigger copyright symbol than the website name), they could've shrink the text so that it doesn't have line break (also that the text width is almost the same width of the rectangular box, which no other sites have done), and most of them have no drop shadow to distinguish from the background.

    Even if this was fixed, there is something that bothers me even if its considered professional: placing a watermark over a previous watermark (meaning covering it with another, different name), which makes watermarking pointless.

  2. The entire site looks like it was made by a kid. Why? Because it has:

    1. CAPS on every main topics, independent clauses, and nouns on its sentences. Seriously, I see at least one sentence overuse caps on almost every paragraphs

    2. Font colors are too flashy. Why alternate between multiple colors on the text? You have seen many professional website or at least, some decent websites that doesn't have a portion of the page that you mainly look at don't have that much colors. The only good reason to have different colors is for hyperlinks or highlights.

    3. Background has flat colors and looks boring. I'm okay if its black, white, or have textures. But having a flat color background pretty much shows lack of ideas. I'm okay if it does has something on it, but not too flashy.

    4. Back on the images, all of them don't use transparent background. Gota love to see white (or black) background on the images.

    5. whenever an item is listed in a grid, they didn't bother to use a table, box HTML, or bulleted/numered to separate with the main body of text.

    6. To fill the logo's background (the image behind the "Hackers Home Page" banner), they repeated the image frequently (as in, repetition of a tiny image so that you see a dozen of them in a single whole image) of a portrait of a head across, which looks very ugly.


  3. There are reports of scams on their sites (itself) and they didn't bother to fix it. Probably the reason why my anti-malware flag that site as a "risky site". Its ironic that they had a disclaimer that "you should not be asking about illegal activites".




Anyone who want to go to a "cheating website", try https://www.ifixit.com/ as an alternative.
Give thanks to RPG hacker for working on Asar.
literally any educational website
Google now. Bring back the 1998 design, that was good designing.
Sponsored by your local carniceria
Originally posted by HuFlungDu
Holy shit lmao

Tim and Eric's original website was pretty bad, but it's irony so idk if it counts. It had a great thing where if you click on an image of their face it would play a voice clip of them saying their name.
ask me if i give a f*ck...