| VIPs |
|
Forum Index - SMW Central - Moderation of Hacks and Files - VIPs |
|
Pages:  1  |
|
|
|
| Posted on 2012-03-13 09:53:08 AM |
Link | Quote |
|
|
I have a question for you guys. VIP5 has been removed numerous times for being submitted without permission. Well, why do we have all the other VIPs? Shouldn't they be removed as well?
|
|
| Posted on 2012-03-13 12:06:23 PM |
Link | Quote |
|
|
If I am correct from reading other threads about this issue, those VIPs were submitted a while ago by the author.
|
|
| Posted on 2012-03-13 01:32:55 PM |
Link | Quote |
|
The Vip hacks was submitted by him, him, him, him and him.
The most probably is than they are the Vipper, but the guy who submitted the fifth one isn't. So here goes my question, why can't we submit hacks just because they aren't ours? The hacks section is just for put hacks in a certain place for we don't need to search it on the internet, and if the author didn't said "DON'T post in SMWC", I don't see any reason to don't do it.
Yep.
|
|
| Posted on 2012-03-13 01:34:42 PM |
Link | Quote |
|
|
IIRC, Carol doesn't want VIP 5 to be distributed, along with later versions of Brutal Mario than the one submitted here.
|
|
| Posted on 2012-03-13 01:41:01 PM |
Link | Quote |
|
Originally posted by AustinThe Vip hacks was submitted by him, him, him, him and him.
The most probably is than they are the Vipper, but the guy who submitted the fifth one isn't. So here goes my question, why can't we submit hacks just because they aren't ours? The hacks section is just for put hacks in a certain place for we don't need to search it on the internet, and if the author didn't said "DON'T post in SMWC", I don't see any reason to don't do it.
Yep.
I disagree, if the user doesn't want it's job to be submitted to SMWC then don't submit, it's the choice of some hackers and you must respect them even if you submit and put the original author.
Also, there's many reasons of why some hacks can't be submitted in SMWC, like bugs, incomplete gameplay or even fear of stealing a thing in this hack.
|
|
| Posted on 2012-03-13 06:16:43 PM |
Link | Quote |
|
I've always said if I were to leave SMWC but continue hacking I'd never want any of my stuff to be hosted on the site. I guess in a way it's sort of like a TV show. If a TV channel starts showing the show without permission, it's serious business.
You CAN submit another's hack if you have express permission you can prove but otherwise, nope.
|
|
| Posted on 2012-03-13 07:24:25 PM |
Link | Quote |
|
|
I undestand. Doesn't seem like something serious, but okay the creators have their rights.
|
|
| Posted on 2012-03-13 07:29:03 PM |
Link | Quote |
|
Originally posted by AustinI undestand. Doesn't seem like something serious, but okay the creators have their rights.
Well, technically it is something serious and like marioVSshadow said, you must ASK the permission first but it'll be waste of time if he/she already said that don't want to submit his/her works.
|
|
| Posted on 2012-03-20 03:47:15 PM |
Link | Quote |
|
|
Distributing without permission may me like stealing. The author said not to distribute it, so don't do it. It's the author's hack and only he/she decides if it should be submitted here or not. VIP5 as well as the newest Brutal/Kitiku Mario versions shouldn't be submitted because the authors decided to not submit them to other sites. This mostly happens with japanese hacks but it may also happen with other hacks.
|
|
| Posted on 2012-03-31 02:18:19 PM |
Link | Quote |
|
|
Personally, I only thought the ASCII version of VIP 3 was safe to submit under the consideration that the Mario version of the game was already in the Hacks section. I thought similarly about Piper1202 submitting the Mario versions of 1, 2, and 4.
|
|
|
| Pages: 1 |
|
|
|
|
Forum Index - SMW Central - Moderation of Hacks and Files - VIPs |
