Originally posted by Lui37
Hmm does that still happen? I thought I fixed it.. ah well.
Oh, whoops. For some reason I thought that bug report was posted after your fix, not before it. My mistake.
Originally posted by Lui37
Also, I think you want to take care of this one too. According to MaxodeX, it seems to happen only when you use the GAIN commands (i.e. $FC and $FA $05). I don't know more than that.
Ah, yes, thanks. That's probably going to be the most time-consuming one to fix...
Originally posted by Lui37
How about throwing a warning hinting at the retrocompatibility options, with a prompt that lets the user decide whether they want the program to add #amk to the song if the lack thereof was intentional (read: lazy)? Throwing an error shouldn't be a major problem after all, but I just thought that could be an idea.
The only (minor) problem with that is that there are two types of people who use this program: hack designers and music designers. That option would be really useful for music designers, but hack designers, if they don't know much about custom music, might be left confused, especially if I'm actually asking them about something they probably don't have much knowledge of.
Originally posted by Lui37
Wait, I'm not quite sure what you mean here. Are you saying that using the q "command" for that could desync the envelope changes from the actual ticks..?
If you use the q "command" so that a note ends early, then the gain will also be triggered early, which might make it sound "off" from the rest of the music (since it's, well, early, i.e. just out of time with the music by however long q specified).
Originally posted by Lui37
I still think enabling that would be a good idea in theory. Much easier to apply if you don't want to add rests everywhere (thus eating less space). Anyone could still use rests for that too I guess.
Just to be sure (and this might be a stupid question), but what about $FC? Its purpose was basically an alternative to the $F5 $04 commmand that made it so that you didn't have to put rests everywhere. Again, maybe a stupid question, but I just want to make sure we're on the same page.
I should get a new layout.
Probably won't, though.
Probably won't, though.